Previously, I expressed my disdain for the new movie "He's Just Not that Into You". However, I recently watched a promo for the movie again.

(Damnnit, TiVo! You've been so good to me. Why won't you let me skip into the future instead of being tortured like this?!)

Wait, where was I? Oh, yeah. So, it brought up an interesting new development I had never really thought too much about. In the promo one of the girls (Drew, I think? Or maybe one of the Jennifers) laments the fact that in today's technological society, one can be rejected in at least six seperate forms of media.

That got me thinking...

I have a Blackberry, a Facebook account, a Myspace account, three email accounts and a friend recently got me into to Twittering (still reserving judgement). I keep in good contact with all my friends on a daily basis....yet I think I've had only five phone conversations in the past month.

Just a few weeks ago I was over my best friend's house. She and I have been friends since college and I am also good friends with her husband who I have known for almost six years.




Oh, no.  I wasn't talking to you!  I'm talking to the guy on the end.  Sorry...




Said friends are BIG mac people (judge if you will...I do). They had recently purchased a flat screen and we were supposed to be watching some movie, I forget which. During the few hours I spent over there not one of us looked up from or respective devices. Oh, we talked to each other, but we talked about what we were doing on our macs and iphone and blackberrys. It didn't really click what was happening until I was devoid of an electronic device for a moment and realized what was going on.

Yes, I had to have my electronic teat taken away before I realized there were other people in the room.

Now some of you might say, well what?

Let me give you another example. Some time past I was staying with my sis up north. Now Sis has never been very technologically savvy. If it didn't come from a shoe store, its completely alien to her.

We were sitting on the couch watch HGTV and I was "sexting" a guy friend of mine.

If you don't know, I'm not going to explain it so don't ask.



Is that even legal?!

She, of course, asked me what I was doing and why I had a smirk on my face. When I explained she proceeded to look at me as though I had grown fangs.

"Why don't you just call him?", she asked, "How can you get anything out of it?"

And for the life of me I couldn't explain...still can't.

I just do. (Smirk)

I enjoying texting, emailing, poking or even twittering my friends. Its a great for people like me who are socially dyslexic to keep in touch with people without having to actually...you know talk to them.

The flip side, as pointed out by those gravelings in that damn chick flick is that its also a new and exciting way to get dumped.

Back in January I was on my way out of town to visit family when I ran into an old classmate from high school. I'm slightly ashamed to say I didn't remember him, but I played it off rather well if I do say so myself.

We chatted for a few minutes and then he asked for my number. Sure...why not? Well, the longer he talked...the weirder he got. From what I could glean from the conversation he was that psycho kid back in high school who wore a black trenchcoat and still ate paste.

You photoshopped everyone in your class picture into an active volcano!  That is...awesome...





Uh-Oh....see this is why I'm wholly in favor of Barney's Lemon Law. Luckily, my flight got called before he showed me all of the paper dolls he made of the people who wronged him in junior high.

Unlucky for me he also friended me on Facebook...and called me....and texted me.

And I never answered....at all...not even once. Because...really, I'm not trying to be called upon the witness stand after he expresses his true feelings at the class reunion.
So there you have it. I rejected a man in three different forms of communication.

Does that make it harsher. No, I don't think so. Because it also gave him three different ways to bug the crap out of me...for a month. (Yeah, I'm going to say that taking hints weren't his strong suit.)

Now before you right me off as a bi$#%, I've had my fare share of electronic induced stress.

Specifically the type brought on by that unbelievably long wait during your typical email flirt session. You send him a suitably flirtatious email with just the right amount of sweet and then you wait...and wait.


You're a guy.  Does a winky smiley face means he likes me or did he just miss the shift key?








Its the equivalent to that painfully long pause on the phone when you're talking to a guy and you've said something so mind-numbingly dumb that he has to school his response before he answers because...well, he does still want to sleep with you.

But the email pause is worse. Why? Well, even if you've said the right thing. Even if you crafted the perfect witty response to whatever joke he just made, you still have to wait and you have no idea why.

He may have lost his internet connection...he may be distracted by people he's actually in the room with...he may even be working on his thoughtful retort.

But you don't know that. All you have is a fifteen minute panic attack as you stare at the screen begging that damn pop up window to tell you've got mail.

Do I think all this technology has made relationships more strenuous and difficult. No.

Do I think its made dating richer and more engaged? ....No.

Its just a new flavor on the menu.


|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

Every morning while getting dressed I have play Morning Express with Robin Meade on the television. I like her because she's light and fluffy and gives the news in bite size chunks which my wholly non-news minded brain can process. Well, this morning one of the top stories was about how musicians are going before congress to force radio stations to pay to play their music.

THE HELL?!?!?!



Will I Am speaking on Capitol Hill for MusicFirst


According to reports, Sheryl Crow, will.i.am, Herbie Hancock and other entertainers on Tuesday urged Congress to force radio stations to pay performers when their music is broadcast.

I could bring up the stupidity of bringing legislation against a business in the middle of recession in which businesses are crashing left and right, INCLUDING the peripheral type of business they are attacking, but I think that's a given.

No, my argument is that this wouldn't even work in a stable economy.

The musicFIRST Coalition, the group formed by these narcissists, is arguing that Satellite radio, Internet radio and cable TV music channels already pay fees to performers and musicians, along with songwriter royalties. AM and FM radio stations do not pay performers' royalties, just songwriters.

Well, yes that's true, but there's a fundamental difference between radio and those other services. People are paying to listen to these services. No one is paying radio. Radio functions under the same principle as television (the medium in which I earn my paycheck), they provide free content as long as you sit through their advertisers shtick.

For anyone who know anything about advertisement knows that hasn't really been working to well since the advent of DVRs and...well...satellite radio. Think about it. What was the last commercial you sat through while watching your favorite show? When was the last time you didn't change stations when a commercial came on the radio? Heck, when was the last time you listened to the radio?

As for songwriters getting paid...well, they got in when the getting was good. You snooze, you lose. Maybe is you could write your own music...well....

Demanding payment from radio is like getting mad at the special needs greeter for not knowing exactly what aisle you can find foot powder.



Patti LaBelle speaks on Capitol Hill about music

Radio and television stations aren't rolling in the green right now and all this legislation is going to do is cost innocent workers (i.e. people like me) their jobs when these stations cut costs to pay for Patti LaBelle's new wig.

Will.i.am and the rest of these greedy bastards should try making decent records for once instead of demanding cash for the crap they have out now...oh, wait, but he's too busy playing with holograms and nut-tugging on Obama. My bad....


|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

This is the Pepsi Max commercial that is running in Europe. Much better than the slapstick "I'm Good" campaign they have running here.



|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

Judge gets million dollar payoff for jailing kids without legal representation

Judges allegedly took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juveniles in lockups .

WILKES-BARRE, Pa. - For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses.
The explanation, prosecutors say, was corruption on the bench.

For more on this story click here.



|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

Warning: Mature content. Not suitable for children and bubble-headed chicks who should no better. YOU HAVE BEEN ADVISED.

So a few weeks ago I was perusing the bargain table at Borders. I am an avid reader, but due to our current economic times, full price is reserved for those literary gems that deserve certain recognition (you know, like the latest Harry Potter novel).



As I gazed at the usual fair wondering if Tuesday's with Morrie will ever peek my fancy enough to pick it up (two years on and no go), I come across this....



I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell



Well, with a cover like that, who wouldn't pick it up. I turn it over to read the description and this is what I find....

"My name is Tucker Max, and I am an asshole. I get excessively drunk at inappropriate times, disregard social norms, indulge every whim, ignore the consequences of my actions, mock idiots and posers, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable, and just generally act like a raging dickhead. But, I do contribute to humanity in one very important way: I share my adventures with the world."

Wow...just wow. Well, of course you know, I had to buy it.



Now anyone who had met or spoken to me knows I have what some polite people would call a quick wit.

My friends, however, would call me a smart ass.

This book was right up my alley.



"...In Hell" is a collection of short stories written by Tucker Max, a humorist and Internet personality who started a blog on a bet back in 2002 regaling tales of his many many bar conquests. It made the NY Times bestseller list in 2006, 2007, 2008...and 2009. Off to a good start so far.

So for the past week and a half I have been guffawing, gasping and damn right laughing out loud at this foolishness. I have already regaled some of my friends with some of the more salient points of the book...and gotten disgusted looks in return.

And I couldn't care less.

This is guy is the epitome of EVERYTHING your mother told you to look out for when dating...HE is the reason you're always supposed to carry a $20 in your purse for cab fare...HE is the reason you don't go out without a good girlfriend who has your back...I'd almost go as far to say HE is the reason for birth control.

Let me give you an example. This is an exert from one of the chapters appropriately (or inappropriately depending on your viewpoint) titled:

"Tucker F**ks a Fat Girl; Hilarity Ensues"
(FYI...all censorship is on my part. He has no qualms about language)

"We've all done it. We've all accidentally f**ked a fat girl. ....... Getting smashed and goin' hoggin' is almost a rite of passage for the American male." [p. 46]

He then proceeds to recount a tale in which he was so ashamed by a fat girl he picked up online, that he threw her clothes out the window after sex so that she would have to leave in a hurry and not meet his roommates who were in the living room.

This, sadly, is one of the tamer stories. This guy is horrible to the point of unbelievable at times. The things he's said and did make him one of the lowest forms of life, but why did I like the book you ask?

One: He is a good writer. Each story was engaging.

Each time I wondered, Could it get any worse?"

Would he be able to still get laid acting like such a jerk?

Yes...and, sadly yes.

Which brings me to my next point as to why I liked this book. It is a log of all the stupid vacuous bi**hes I can't stand. A testament to all the bimbos we think only exist in National Lampoon movies.

Let me ask the ladies out there a question...if a guy walked up to you and said, "My name is [insert name here] and I am going to law school at Duke so I can be really rich and buy shiny things for my wife. What's your name?" [p. 97] would you sneak off with him an hour later to some random RV to have sex on a stranger's bed?

If a guy you met in a bar in VEGAS told you he was in a Christian Rap band and said his name was "Big Baby Jesus" and his friends were "The Beat Boxin Prophet" and "DJ Orthodoxy". would you take him back to your friend's house and screw him on the couch in the basement? [p.84-88]

If the guy you took to a party started flirting with another girl and when you ask him, "Why do you keep talking to her instead of me?", he says, "I like her", would you then take him upstairs to give him fellatio to prove you're better than her? [p.89-91]

If you answered "no", you have sense. If you answered "yes" to any of the above...get the hell off my planet.

I hate to say that the majority of the girls in this book got exactly what was coming to them..but yeah, I'm gonna.

This man is an ass. He admits freely how horrible he is...he even named the book with the express realization he is going to hell. According to a few chapters he has gotten his comeuppance (the fake chlamydia scare is my personal favorite), but overall he's gotten away with alot.

He does douche things the first time he meets these girls and still gets laid.

Hell, some of the chapters even recount stories of women WHO MET HIM THROUGH HIS WEBSITE which recounts these horrible tales and still wanted to screw him.

So cheers to Tucker Max. He's an upfront jackass, but they are delusional sh**-for brains.

...and I'll take jerk over stupid any day....just not to my bed.

UPDATE: Apparently there is a movie based on the book slated to be released sometime this year. Guess whose going to be first in line?!

[Images courtesy of wikipedia.org]



|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

The T-Mobile Dance

Love it! Speaking from a professional perspective, a feel good moment will win out over the hard sell most of the time.



|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

For anyone whose been by my blog recently may have noticed that my template went to hell in a handbasket. Who knew that if you went over your flickr (or photobucket, I don't really keep up with this type of thing) bandwith limitation, they stopped linking any of the pictures? Communist bastards....

So (Fanfare) we have a new design now. Actually I think I like it better, but a lot of my widgets went "bye bye". I'll try to clean and rearrange over the next few days.

Smooches!


|

Read Users' Comments ( 0 )

Ginnifer Goodwin, Jennifer Aniston and Jennifer Connely decide how they're going to destroy what little dignity they have left in 'He's Just Not That Into You'.






As some of you may already know,"He's Just Not That Into You"opens February 6th just in time for Valentine's Day. The movie chronicles several interconnecting relationships where one person, usually the woman, is more emotionally involved than the man. It stars Drew Barrymore, Justin Long, Ben Affleck and Hollywood's current sad sack single girl, Jennifer Aniston.

I had the pleasure, or depending on your opinion, the displeasure, of reading the book on which the movie was based. The author, Greg Behrendt, gives a startling and uncomfortable look into the male psyche...and how completely simplistic it is. Apparently, women's first mistake when it comes to relationships, is giving a man too much credit. Think of a man like a five-year-old. If he wants the shiny toy, he'll do whatever he has to to get it and won't stop until its his. If he doesn't make a grab for it, well..."He's just not that into you".

Fine. I get it. If he wants you, he wants you. If he doesn't, he doesn't. Simple...to the point and you can wrap it into a nice little catchphrase. But what about the middle ground guys? Those guys that want to play with the new toy really bad at first, but then get bored with it? The guy who can't decide if he likes the new toy, but hasn't decided to put it down yet? Or the guy who calls out of the blue every few weeks, does his damnedest to get on your good side, but is gone faster than bad Chinese?(Okay, I lost my toy metaphor, but you get what I'm saying.)

The book, while mildly entertaining and informative, discusses the intense passion a man should have, but never delves into the mild flirtation that many of us has more experience with. Whose to say you want him to call you the next day? "Bug-a-boo" was recorded for a reason, you know.

But this isn't why I started this post. I didn't come here to discuss what a man thinks or feels, because in my near Thirties cynicism, I'm starting to question whether these creatures exist. (Kidding...mostly) I'm here to talk about this genre that both the book and movie exploit.


He grabbed my butt!! He sooo wants to marry me!





The chick lit/flick....a genre that takes every cloying and degrading facet of being single and dating and then points out everything you've done wrong to make you single and how its was always your fault. This movie takes it a step further by telling you you're an idiot for thinking he wanted you in the first place, but they tie it in a pretty bow by saying that you're "undervaluing" yourself. That's the "real problem". You just haven't found that guy who loves you for you.

Now I haven't seen the movie (nor do I plan to), but I can guarantee that in the end of this farce they will probably portray an wholly unattainable ending where everyone ends up with who exactly they are supposed to be with and live happily ever after no matter how implausible it may seem.

This does not compute with reality. Happily ever after only exist in Disney movies. Heck, even one of the stars of the film thought she had what was considered by many a "happily ever after" and it walked away with a nice pair of lips and a huge rack.

So what am I so angry about do you ask? Is it simply the bitter single in me rearing its beautifully coiffed head?

...maybe a little. But my main problem is...Why now? Its Valentine's for pity's sake!!!

Valentine's Day, a day which is noted for one of three times a year(See: Christmas and New Year's) when single women status is considered a communicable disease that must be treated with whatever loser can be picked up in time. When pity and "I'm glad I'm not you" is the major reactions you get from your paired friends and family.

Hi, Sweetheart! Try not to run this one off like you did the last one. Okay?



So at the lowest of the low you want me to sit through another movie illustrating to me how my relationships fail?! And don't even think of giving me that crap that this is a date movie. What man in their right mind would suggest to their date, "Hey, let's go see that movie that points out how I'm just screwing you and will probably dump you later?" and what woman would suggest, "I really want to see that Jennifer Aniston movie where she spends half the movie being a shrew about getting married the way I'm probably doing to you!"

No this movie is purely for the lonely, pathetic single girls who the filmmakers KNOW have nothing better to do. They know we'll show up with our pathetic single girlfriends, watch till we're almost in tears, then go to some bar and rip into our exes and vow that it will never happen again.

Well, that's some bull $#!+...and you know what? I'm just not that into it.


|

Read Users' Comments ( 1 )